Post #295
It may not be as bad as you think Jim
Look at the wheel HP figures.
Regal is 139 - this is regarded as pretty much spot on for a standard '6.
The Track 'N' Road graph shows 164 @ the wheels.
So you've gained 25 BHP at the wheels - sounds alright to me?
There maybe many reasons for the vast differences in engine BHP / theoretical transmission losses.
It's often down to the dyno and the software that's used with it.
Some dyno's like Bosch will measure coastdown losses, and add this to the measured dyno HP. This is the better way to calcualte theoretical transmission losses.
Some like Dyno Dynamics add on a flat-rate percentage, normally 15-20%. Which is obviously a load of rubbish.
If you ever manage to speak to Wayne Schofield he will be able to tell you much more about it:
chipwizard wrote:Things that affect wheel power v flywheel power readings...
Tranmission drag (oil type, temp, clearances, wear etc...) Driveshaft drag (you see small changes to this with different ride hights and thus, shaft angles)
Mostly... tyres. Make, type, width, compound, pressure, temperature, toe, camber (the roller contact patch is not at the bottom of the tyre so camber causes scrub of course) etc.
Roller diameter (smaller rollers cause greater tyre deflection and thus, greater losses) and roller separation as the car sits deeper into the rollers if they are further apart and this causes greater losses (with improved grip)
________________________________________
Contact Details:
rich@lynxpowerengineering.co.uk
07732 822546