displaying posts 1 to 25 of 56

Pages (3): [1] 2 3

Author Subject: low boost charger or 240bhp n/a
309btcc

**DODGY SELLER**

Location: england

Registered: 07 Jul 2009

Posts: 530

Status: Offline

Post #1
iam in the middle of a dilema i am curios of the low boost conversion but also love the n/a sound on bodies.. and both same sort power???
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 01:52
allesclar

Seasoned Pro

Location: Sheffield

Registered: 17 May 2009

Posts: 4,254

Status: Offline

Post #2
240bhp NA engine will cost you far more than a low boost. Thumbs up

________________________________________

Team allesclar ®

Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 01:56
309btcc

**DODGY SELLER**

Location: england

Registered: 07 Jul 2009

Posts: 530

Status: Offline

Post #3
not with what ive been offerd mate.. just curious as too what would be quicker as ive heard alot about them low boost cars not being that impressive...
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 02:00
welshpug!

Capt Pedantic

Location: Bigend, Wales.

Registered: 27 Mar 2007

Posts: 25,838

Status: Offline

Post #4
low boost is about 6k right?

could probably do a 240 bhp n/a 2.2 for about that much if you do a lot of the work yourself.

________________________________________

need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.com

Bring on the Trumpets.

Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 02:00
SteviePut

Seasoned Pro

Location: Down south

Registered: 20 Oct 2005

Posts: 13,637

Status: Offline

Post #5
Ask Daveyboy how much his is costing becasue IIRC 240ish bhp is his target Smile

Personally I would, if you want proven power, go with a low boost conversion. NA route will be a bit hit and missYes If someone could guarantee me 240bhp NA then I would actually prefer that over a supercharger. But that's just meSmile

________________________________________

My old man wrote me a letter from prison once. It said if you don't want to end up in here, stay away from crime, women and drugs. Trouble is, that don't leave you much else to do, does it?
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 02:01
roberts_306

Senior User

Location: Halesowen

Registered: 21 Nov 2007

Posts: 789

Status: Offline

Post #6
Go for the 240 Bhp n/a as its far better, cant beat raw power but as everyone has said it aint cheap!

________________________________________

www.pugsport-racing.co.uk
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 02:04
309btcc

**DODGY SELLER**

Location: england

Registered: 07 Jul 2009

Posts: 530

Status: Offline

Post #7
i can get the n/a package for 2k plus the sound of throttle bodies is mental. think ill go for n/a thanx huys...always a help
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 02:05
roberts_306

Senior User

Location: Halesowen

Registered: 21 Nov 2007

Posts: 789

Status: Offline

Post #8
My dream would be 240 Bhp but probably wont happen Sad so I will have to be happy with Jenvey's for the moment

________________________________________

www.pugsport-racing.co.uk
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 02:07
309btcc

**DODGY SELLER**

Location: england

Registered: 07 Jul 2009

Posts: 530

Status: Offline

Post #9
well i can get alot cheap thru people in handy places lol ive got cams already and pistons and rods just need bodies inlet and emerld managment
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 02:14
jeffers Forum Admin

Location: Leeds

Registered: 14 Dec 2003

Posts: 3,702

Status: Offline

Post #10
309btcc wrote:
well i can get alot cheap thru people in handy places lol ive got cams already and pistons and rods just need bodies inlet and emerld managment

Not bein funny but i struggle to believe you will get 240 BHP N/A and reliable for the amount of money your talkin, as Welshpug says you will have to do a LOT of work yorself to get close, but i still believe you'll struggle without spending some serious dosh..... Just my 2p's worth! Good on ya for tryin if indeed you do though!Wink

________________________________________

Team Running Engine again!
Team Negative Camber!
My Budget track engine build thread!
Now appearing at a Trackday near you!!Hyper Hyper
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 02:21
welshpug!

Capt Pedantic

Location: Bigend, Wales.

Registered: 27 Mar 2007

Posts: 25,838

Status: Offline

Post #11
well here's a proven recipie for a 240 bhp mi16, gti6 would be similar...


87mm/88mm bore, forged pistons, forged rods, 2.1 td crank.

Sandy brown throttle body inlet, petert inlet cam.

standard head, standard exhaust cam, maniflow off the shelf exhaust manifold.

________________________________________

need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.com

Bring on the Trumpets.

Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 02:35
alastairh

Regular

Location: Kettering

Registered: 14 Jun 2007

Posts: 375

Status: Offline

Post #12
welshpug! wrote:
low boost is about 6k right?

could probably do a 240 bhp n/a 2.2 for about that much if you do a lot of the work yourself.


You could buy Maxi's 205 for 5k with 250ish BHP! And then you would have a complete 205 to play with.

________________________________________

205 GTI6
Primera GT
Xsara VTS
306 GTI6
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 02:45
jammamayhew Banned!

Location: Ipswich

Registered: 14 Jul 2008

Posts: 3,637

Status: Offline

Post #13
alastairh wrote:
welshpug! wrote:
low boost is about 6k right?

could probably do a 240 bhp n/a 2.2 for about that much if you do a lot of the work yourself.


You could buy Maxi's 205 for 5k with 250ish BHP! And then you would have a complete 205 to play with.


I thought the low boost conversion was around £4k all in?Blink

________________________________________

JAMMA "M44YHW" MAYHEW

LOSE WEIGHT NOW - ASK ME HOW -
NUTRI-FIX

GTi6 LPG, The best of both worlds!

2006: 1997 R reg 306 1.4 Miami - Diablo Red - DEAD
2007: 1999 V reg 306 1.4 Meridian - Diablo Red - SOLD
2007-09: 1998 S reg 306 GTi6 - Diablo Red - DEAD
2009-10: 1998 R reg Corsa 1.2 - Blue - SOLD
2010-13: 2001 Y reg 306 GTi6 LPG - Diablo Red - DEAD
2013 - 2013: 2000 X reg GTi6 LPG - Moonstone Blue - DEAD
2013 - current: 2001 X reg GTi6 LPG - Diablo Red
]FOR SALE[/b]

"I LIVE FOR THE 306"
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 02:54
berger

Seasoned Pro

Location: Bathurst

Registered: 26 Oct 2008

Posts: 1,068

Status: Offline

Post #14
jammamayhew wrote:
alastairh wrote:
welshpug! wrote:
low boost is about 6k right?

could probably do a 240 bhp n/a 2.2 for about that much if you do a lot of the work yourself.


You could buy Maxi's 205 for 5k with 250ish BHP! And then you would have a complete 205 to play with.


I thought the low boost conversion was around £4k all in?Blink


Rich lists it as £4300 on his website. Labour of £750.

My Xsara was £5000 from Carl, this has a larger than standard IC that cost more as well as being a bit more difficult to do wiring wise.

Plus then you will want to fit an oil cooler to go with it, so budget £250ish for that too.

________________________________________

Bang'in 7 gram rocks!
I have one gear, GO!
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 03:06
welshpug!

Capt Pedantic

Location: Bigend, Wales.

Registered: 27 Mar 2007

Posts: 25,838

Status: Offline

Post #15
indeed, Maxi's car is said to be quite something, rather a different approach to sarty but in the end still a bloody quick car.

________________________________________

need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.com

Bring on the Trumpets.

Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 03:16
jammamayhew Banned!

Location: Ipswich

Registered: 14 Jul 2008

Posts: 3,637

Status: Offline

Post #16
Not far off then.
PRICE LIST HERE

________________________________________

JAMMA "M44YHW" MAYHEW

LOSE WEIGHT NOW - ASK ME HOW -
NUTRI-FIX

GTi6 LPG, The best of both worlds!

2006: 1997 R reg 306 1.4 Miami - Diablo Red - DEAD
2007: 1999 V reg 306 1.4 Meridian - Diablo Red - SOLD
2007-09: 1998 S reg 306 GTi6 - Diablo Red - DEAD
2009-10: 1998 R reg Corsa 1.2 - Blue - SOLD
2010-13: 2001 Y reg 306 GTi6 LPG - Diablo Red - DEAD
2013 - 2013: 2000 X reg GTi6 LPG - Moonstone Blue - DEAD
2013 - current: 2001 X reg GTi6 LPG - Diablo Red
]FOR SALE[/b]

"I LIVE FOR THE 306"
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 03:20
matt h 306

Regular

Location: Wiltshire

Registered: 22 Sep 2003

Posts: 350

Status: Offline

Post #17
What everyone seems to forget when comparing the low boost vs decent n/a price is the n/a will be a rebuilt engine, new rods pistons bearings etc, the low boost is just a charger bolted to a used 10+ year old engine.



Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 03:21
jeffers Forum Admin

Location: Leeds

Registered: 14 Dec 2003

Posts: 3,702

Status: Offline

Post #18
matt h 306 wrote:
What everyone seems to forget when comparing the low boost vs decent n/a price is the n/a will be a rebuilt engine, new rods pistons bearings etc, the low boost is just a charger bolted to a used 10+ year old engine.




Hmmm that is a fair point..... Hmm

________________________________________

Team Running Engine again!
Team Negative Camber!
My Budget track engine build thread!
Now appearing at a Trackday near you!!Hyper Hyper
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 03:48
cwspellowe

Seasoned Pro

Location: Calderbank

Registered: 19 Jul 2009

Posts: 6,496

Status: Offline

Post #19
£4.3k inc VAT and labour, so about £3.5k to do it yourself.

Matt raises a good point though, for all you know you could fit the Rotrex and ten minuteslater blow a piston or two through a cracked block or something. Then again a new block is cheap as chips these days, whereas replacing forged items or re-boring a new block could be the downside of n/a LOL

________________________________________

Bye bye Sundance Kid Sad
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 03:52
smegal

Seasoned Pro

Location: Leeds

Registered: 26 Dec 2005

Posts: 5,940

Status: Offline

Post #20
welshpug! wrote:
low boost is about 6k right?

could probably do a 240 bhp n/a 2.2 for about that much if you do a lot of the work yourself.


Closer to 4-4.5k

I believe for the road a SC-6 is going to be more drivable than a 240bhp NA engine.

________________________________________

Ex SC-6

Now in a Megane R26
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 03:56
bobdylan_55

Seasoned Pro

Location: derby

Registered: 28 Mar 2009

Posts: 1,466

Status: Offline

Post #21
yes but theres positives on both sides.

the boost route will give the option of high boost (with little mods to the charger setup and some forgies) at a later date and give another 100bhp or so.

However as said, the raw feel and sound of N/A is emmense. Throttle bodies sound so awesome, i love them. my bro has a 1.4 xsi tu engine on sandy brown inlet and it sounds fugin gorgeous. 138bhp from a 1.4 not bad Wink

________________________________________

309 GTi6-T
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 04:00
chrisd306

Seasoned Pro

Location: Perth Scotland

Registered: 26 Nov 2005

Posts: 10,061

Status: Offline

Post #22
and once your low boost spend a further 2.5k and your laughing with 400bhp!!

________________________________________

In my garage just now

2003 BMW M3 & 2009 L200 Raging Bull
& Audi Q5 S Line
AX stock rod & Saxo Stock rod
Sold the bike an charged rallye an bought a caravan, midlife crisis or what!
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 04:01
garry

Regular

Location: Crowland

Registered: 13 Feb 2005

Posts: 305

Status: Offline

Post #23
Don't forget the torque of the SC option. Mine accelerates a fair bit quicker low down than Maxis highly tuned N/A engine.

N/A for track work though.

________________________________________

205 GTI6 S
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 05:25
24seven

Seasoned Pro

Location: Derby

Registered: 05 Oct 2005

Posts: 6,221

Status: Offline

Post #24
welshpug! wrote:
indeed, Maxi's car is said to be quite something, rather a different approach to sarty but in the end still a bloody quick car.


Surprised that hasn't sold already! I'd have it in a heartbeat if I had the money.

________________________________________

Ph1 306 GTi 6 | RX8 231 S1 | YBR 125 Cafe Racer | MT-03 660
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 05:34
matty_rallye

Senior User

Location: Devizes

Registered: 28 Oct 2005

Posts: 966

Status: Offline

Post #25
matt h 306 wrote:
What everyone seems to forget when comparing the low boost vs decent n/a price is the n/a will be a rebuilt engine, new rods pistons bearings etc, the low boost is just a charger bolted to a used 10+ year old engine.





Very good point. I went down to n/a route before these supercharger kits came about, i still would now tbh but as said it is personal choice. But i think if you had the cash for the extra 2.5k to go high boost over low it would be better off doing that, if huge power is what you are after!

________________________________________

2.1 16v 306 Rallye.
Posted 3rd Sep 2010 at 15:03

Pages (3): [1] 2 3

All times are GMT. The time is now 21:17

The Peugeot GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club - ©2024 all rights reserved.

Please Note: The views and opinions found herein are those of individuals, and not of The Peugeot 306 GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club or any individuals involved.
No responsibility is taken or assumed for any comments or statements made on, or in relation to, this website. Please see our updated privacy policy.