It was measured at 0 toe and everything else was perfectly how it should be, it was on one of those expensive hunter allignment machines that they hang targets of your wheels and a machine in the air sends beams to the targets to measure everything and then it puts the info onto a computer, not the cheap crappy ones where you look at the gauges hanging on wheels.

It would be very good on a track but for road use it doesn't give you any confidence to enjoy it if you can't see what's around a bend, with the foot planted it's solid on the road but when you let off the rear end comes alive, as soon as you plant foot again the rear ended becomes stable again. It's very controllable but if I had to lift off and need to slow down due to an obstacle I wouldn't be able to put foot back down to control it, I'm sure on a track it would be very good, but I won't be using it on track that often of like to enjoy it on the road without been dangerous.
In a straight line it's fine, although I must say under hard braking in a straight line I have to put effort in to stop it snaking, I put that down to the massive front brakes though.

Yeah, it looks a little bit to low. Here's my toe and camber: -0.28 on left side and +0.21 on right side
Sorry it's in Swedish but I think you figure it out



And here's my ride height with 205/50-15 Dunlop semi slicks

Ive never liked the feel of running low tyre pressures, seems to make the front feel understeery when you can feel the tyres rolling/flexing on the rims, I was surprised how low was recommended when I read a recent thread about pressures on track.
Would it still be advisable to run low pressures when you've got 17 inch and 40 profile?
Ive got good year eagle f1s but when I everntually get some mileage done and wear them out I'll change over to michelin ps3s if something better hasn't come out by the time that happens.