Post #1
clickymay be of some help, bit pricey
________________________________________
if i dont see you in the mattress il see you in the spring
|
| Author | Subject: 4-2-1 gti6 manifold |
 james_gti6
Senior User  Location: Goodwick Registered: 18 Jan 2010 Posts: 528 Status: Offline |
may be of some help, bit pricey |
 Posted 11th May 2010 at 05:15
|
|
|
dan@msx
Regular  Location: Chesterfield Registered: 11 May 2010 Posts: 108 Status: Offline |
Post #2
wow! bit heavy on the pocket but i bet that would sound immense! |
|
Posted 11th May 2010 at 06:36
|
|
|
buzzbrightyear
Seasoned Pro  Location: hiding all receipts for car Registered: 09 Jul 2008 Posts: 11,901 Status: Offline |
Post #3
Has anybody used one of these?http://www.spoox.co.uk/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=85_151_291&products_id=1703&osCsid=f168c6da1674c9ccfd4136533830cc6d What would it sound like? ________________________________________ andrew315rawson@live.co.ukMoonstone phase 7 gti6 My Project thread: http://www.306gti6.com/forum/showthread.php?id=119992&page=1 |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 16:23
|
|
|
adam b
Seasoned Pro  Location: The Nam Registered: 24 Jan 2006 Posts: 12,828 Status: Offline |
Post #4
Is it really going to give you much more power or torque? £600+ worth?________________________________________ Nothing to see here |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 16:27
|
|
stan_306gti6
Forum Admin Location: Kent Registered: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 21,768 Status: Offline |
Post #5
I don't know why people rave about aftermarket exhaust manifolds...I'm currently running north of 450bhp and I'm using a standard manifold, why the need to change?  ________________________________________ "Supercharged - 454.1bhp/317.5lb/ft"Peugeot 306 GTi-6 2000 (X), Moonstone  |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 16:29
|
|
|
buzzbrightyear
Seasoned Pro Location: hiding all receipts for car Registered: 09 Jul 2008 Posts: 11,901 Status: Offline |
Post #6
I'm interested in what it would do for mine, sound wise and power wise eg, bonus would be it removes that craply fire ring joint which my manifold can be modified to do anyway. I can't see many people having one of these but id Be interested to know what gains and sounds eg has Been seen. The one I linked is over £900 I could add a little turbo to my car for that! ________________________________________ andrew315rawson@live.co.ukMoonstone phase 7 gti6 My Project thread: http://www.306gti6.com/forum/showthread.php?id=119992&page=1 |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 16:31
|
|
|
stan_306gti6
Forum Admin Location: Kent Registered: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 21,768 Status: Offline |
Post #7
Noise could be a factor I suppose, but as for power Rich proved the standard manifold was good enough to flow 540bhp so I can't see it being a benefit. It was also proved that 540bhp was above the limits of the engine capabilities and therefore who knows what the standard manifold is good for until it becomes too much of a restriction?I say its different, noise could be good/bad but as for power, no different.  ________________________________________ "Supercharged - 454.1bhp/317.5lb/ft"Peugeot 306 GTi-6 2000 (X), Moonstone |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 16:41
|
|
|
ryangti6
Seasoned Pro  Location: Pontypool Registered: 01 Sep 2006 Posts: 1,839 Status: Offline |
Post #8
It won't be benificial to those of you with boost I doubt but apparently in N/a form the manifold does become restrictive at ~240 Bhp.They may seem expensive but If you've spent that much money to get a N/a engine to that sort of power the exhaust cost is minimal in perspective I guess and will see a decent extra gain for your money. ________________________________________ Ryan |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 16:54
|
|
|
stan_306gti6
Forum Admin Location: Kent Registered: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 21,768 Status: Offline |
Post #9
Yeah, I see the point of maybe thinking about at highly tuned N/A level, I was more commenting about the one that Andy posted and thinking what it would do to the performance of his car.  ________________________________________ "Supercharged - 454.1bhp/317.5lb/ft"Peugeot 306 GTi-6 2000 (X), Moonstone |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 16:57
|
|
|
buzzbrightyear
Seasoned Pro Location: hiding all receipts for car Registered: 09 Jul 2008 Posts: 11,901 Status: Offline |
Post #10
Do they change the sound much?________________________________________ andrew315rawson@live.co.ukMoonstone phase 7 gti6 My Project thread: http://www.306gti6.com/forum/showthread.php?id=119992&page=1 |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 16:58
|
|
T400 PUG
Banned! Location: Burnley Registered: 01 Jan 1970 Posts: 641 Status: Offline |
Post #11
stan_306gti6 wrote: Noise could be a factor I suppose, but as for power Rich proved the standard manifold was good enough to flow 540bhp so I can't see it being a benefit. It was also proved that 540bhp was above the limits of the engine capabilities and therefore who knows what the standard manifold is good for until it becomes too much of a restriction? I say its different, noise could be good/bad but as for power, no different. it can only help though stan. If a 540 bhp engine was running a standard mani and it proved unreliable then surely a mani like that would help it perform better/last longer. after all the insane amount of heat from lots of power needs to dissipate as fast and as quicky as possible. for that price id expect stainless and wtf are those clip things. Id avoid spoox tbh  |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 17:00
|
|
|
buzzbrightyear
Seasoned Pro Location: hiding all receipts for car Registered: 09 Jul 2008 Posts: 11,901 Status: Offline |
Post #12
The one with the clips in, I was wondering why thy was also, but the one I linked is even dearer and has no clips. ________________________________________ andrew315rawson@live.co.ukMoonstone phase 7 gti6 My Project thread: http://www.306gti6.com/forum/showthread.php?id=119992&page=1 |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 17:02
|
|
|
mattgti6phase2
Seasoned Pro  Location: inside my 6 abusing the tarmac!! Registered: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 2,371 Status: Offline |
Post #13
stan_306gti6 wrote: Noise could be a factor I suppose, but as for power Rich proved the standard manifold was good enough to flow 540bhp so I can't see it being a benefit. It was also proved that 540bhp was above the limits of the engine capabilities and therefore who knows what the standard manifold is good for until it becomes too much of a restriction? I say its different, noise could be good/bad but as for power, no different. This ________________________________________ Team Nile 6 Team: 40.2 MPG 5 x a 306 owner! currently abusing type r's in a town near you ™  I truely live for the 306 ® Build date: 29th October 1997 Wednesday's car midweek madness  |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 18:08
|
|
|
atterz
Seasoned Pro  Location: Stafford Registered: 18 Feb 2011 Posts: 1,134 Status: Offline |
Post #14
I really cant remember exactly what happened at 540bhp? What failed on the engine?________________________________________ owain wrote: A GTI-6 with a good dashboard and the seats down can outsprint an E46 M3 in July. |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 18:36
|
|
|
stan_306gti6
Forum Admin Location: Kent Registered: 18 Jan 2004 Posts: 21,768 Status: Offline |
Post #15
atterz wrote: I really cant remember exactly what happened at 540bhp? What failed on the engine? The heat between the cylinders was too much and the HG kept failing. ________________________________________ "Supercharged - 454.1bhp/317.5lb/ft"Peugeot 306 GTi-6 2000 (X), Moonstone |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 19:47
|
|
|
welshpug!
Capt Pedantic  Location: Bigend, Wales. Registered: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 25,838 Status: Offline |
Post #16
makes you wonder why it was getting so hot, the ex-will Gollop 306 runs the same block with a pretty big turbo.________________________________________ need a part number? get on here - http://public.servicebox.peugeot.comBring on the Trumpets. |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 19:53
|
|
|
matty_rallye
Senior User  Location: Devizes Registered: 28 Oct 2005 Posts: 966 Status: Offline |
Post #17
buzzbrightyear wrote: Do they change the sound much? Didnt really notice any difference. ________________________________________ 2.1 16v 306 Rallye. |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 19:53
|
|
|
swiftyboi006
Seasoned Pro  Location: Maidenhead Registered: 12 Apr 2010 Posts: 2,110 Status: Offline |
Post #18
I dont see how any aftermarket mani would benefit over the sandard, same material just a different shape. I dot think put would make it the complicated shape it is when they could just make it simple and straight like this one. No difference what so ever apart from noise MAYBE________________________________________ cherry p1.....SOLD (regreting this)blaze p2.....why did i buy this SOLD Black p3 |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 19:55
|
|
|
fatlapit
Seasoned Pro  Location: STOCKSFIELD Registered: 02 Nov 2010 Posts: 3,040 Status: Offline |
Post #19
better flow________________________________________ |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 19:57
|
|
|
matty_rallye
Senior User Location: Devizes Registered: 28 Oct 2005 Posts: 966 Status: Offline |
Post #20
No benefit over the standard manifold on a standard engine. Only benefit is on N/A engines once you get to 230 bhp or above. Different lengths on the secondaries can have quite an effect on midrange aswell, so im told!________________________________________ 2.1 16v 306 Rallye. |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 19:59
|
|
|
buzzbrightyear
Seasoned Pro Location: hiding all receipts for car Registered: 09 Jul 2008 Posts: 11,901 Status: Offline |
Post #21
Im sure rich mentioned he changed the pistons to stop it blowing up, because the ones he was sent wasn't exactly the compression ratio he had wanted. Somehody explained to me that supercharged is like halfway between n/a and boosted engine eg turbo, it's not n/a but it runs more n/a than a turbo in relation to exhaust and back flow eg Is this right? Did you it had a negative effect on midrange? ________________________________________ andrew315rawson@live.co.ukMoonstone phase 7 gti6 My Project thread: http://www.306gti6.com/forum/showthread.php?id=119992&page=1 |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 21:09
|
|
|
eliotrw
Seasoned Pro  Location: Southwark Registered: 18 Jul 2010 Posts: 4,864 Status: Offline |
Post #22
Yeah im sure he read that the issues at the power were sorted but the reason you dont get them that way is A) they spin up at 100mph Theres no point in the extra for the decrease in realiability________________________________________ Ex- Phase 3 China GTi-6 T-Reg |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 21:16
|
|
|
T400 PUG
Banned! Location: Burnley Registered: 01 Jan 1970 Posts: 641 Status: Offline |
Post #23
all i know is the design of the manifold dramatically effects the power and torque in relation to where it comes and where it peaks off within the rev range. |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 21:18
|
|
|
buzzbrightyear
Seasoned Pro Location: hiding all receipts for car Registered: 09 Jul 2008 Posts: 11,901 Status: Offline |
Post #24
It would be nice to have the equipment and the ability to make a few different ones up and experiment. ________________________________________ andrew315rawson@live.co.ukMoonstone phase 7 gti6 My Project thread: http://www.306gti6.com/forum/showthread.php?id=119992&page=1 |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 21:23
|
|
|
fatlapit
Seasoned Pro Location: STOCKSFIELD Registered: 02 Nov 2010 Posts: 3,040 Status: Offline |
Post #25
http://www.burnsstainless.com/theory.aspx principles ________________________________________ |
|
Posted 16th Apr 2012 at 21:28
|
|
The Peugeot GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club - ©2024 all rights reserved.
Please Note: The views and opinions found herein are those of individuals, and not of The Peugeot 306 GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club or any individuals involved.
No responsibility is taken or assumed for any comments or statements made on, or in relation to, this website. Please see our updated privacy policy.