displaying posts 1 to 24 of 24

Author Subject: Induction piping
cwspellowe

Seasoned Pro

Location: Calderbank

Registered: 19 Jul 2009

Posts: 6,496

Status: Offline

Post #1
Another job for tidying up some bits and pieces, noticed that the ICV pipe had split off the main inlet pipe, presumably letting the engine fill with unfiltered air Doh

Don't know how long it was like this so I set about replacing and upgrading. Saw someone's thread on here with a 90degree elbow fitted instead and, while it might not make much difference to the car, it looks shiny Cool

When i took the old pipework off I noticed another eric, whoever fitted the K&N before me didn't use the right coupler and the hose clamp had fallen off, so the filter wasn't even attached to the pipe Shock

Must have been like that for a while by the looks of it, given the fact the car RR'd at 175bhp and 143lbft i'd expect at least one of the figures to be up slightly now, not least a better torque curve. That combined with last month's full service and engine flush means she's purring smoothly now and seems to "bark" more than it did.

I also saved expense (not that it's expensive anyway) by using the old breather pipe, the dog leg shape meant the breather sat quite nicely out of the way Smile

Ingredients:

90 degree alloy pipe, 76mm OD, 150mm x 150mm
Two 4 ply silicone joiners, 76mm ID, 76mm long
Mini breather filter
4 70-90mm hose clamps
2 small hose clamps
Coupler for the breather

Before:



After



I'm not going to write any fitting instructions, it's pretty self explanatory.

Haven't taken if for a drive yet, left the battery unhooked tonight ready for an ECU reset tomorrow, football called me in the house before I had chance. Better sound from the engine now and better throttle response, no idea if that would be noticeable over a well fitted filter though Dunno

________________________________________

Bye bye Sundance Kid Sad
Posted 13th Jun 2010 at 03:48
martin

Regular

Location: Glasgow

Registered: 15 Jan 2010

Posts: 103

Status: Offline

Post #2
Nice article mate .. is your engine standard apart from the iduction kit? I notice you recorded 175bhp before is that standard figure from the gti6? Smile

Are the performance gains better with running the cold air feed as you have done .. opposed to sticking the filter straight onto the throttle body?
Posted 13th Jun 2010 at 04:12
cwspellowe

Seasoned Pro

Location: Calderbank

Registered: 19 Jul 2009

Posts: 6,496

Status: Offline

Post #3
The engine was pretty standard, just an ill fitting K&N and a decat, and what looked to be 3 year old spark plugs and filters. Book figure was 167bhp iirc, taking into account discrepencies with RR's it's a pretty healthy engine on the whole.

Now it's got advanced inlet cam timing, PTFE inlet gasket, custom inlet tract, new filters and plugs too.

Filter straight on the throttle body will reduce peak torque and power due to shortened inlet tract and heatsoak from the engine.

________________________________________

Bye bye Sundance Kid Sad
Posted 13th Jun 2010 at 04:19
309btcc

**DODGY SELLER**

Location: england

Registered: 07 Jul 2009

Posts: 530

Status: Offline

Post #4
i had a k&n didnt like it so got a piper x that soundid awsome and i did the same as u did with that pipe
Posted 13th Jun 2010 at 20:55
adam b

Seasoned Pro

Location: The Nam

Registered: 24 Jan 2006

Posts: 12,828

Status: Offline

Post #5
Chris you can get another 8/9% more torque out of that engine if you look into advancing the cams next time its on the rollers Smile

________________________________________

Nothing to see here
Posted 14th Jun 2010 at 00:47
cwspellowe

Seasoned Pro

Location: Calderbank

Registered: 19 Jul 2009

Posts: 6,496

Status: Offline

Post #6
Already advanced the cams mate, well the inlet anyway, feels like it pulls a bit harder but no hard figures to back it up Smile

________________________________________

Bye bye Sundance Kid Sad
Posted 14th Jun 2010 at 01:07
smegal

Seasoned Pro

Location: Leeds

Registered: 26 Dec 2005

Posts: 5,940

Status: Offline

Post #7
Be really weary of puddles with that set up. The car that I broke 2 years ago had a knackard engine because it sucked up water. It had the filter in the same place as that.

________________________________________

Ex SC-6

Now in a Megane R26
Posted 14th Jun 2010 at 01:35
adam b

Seasoned Pro

Location: The Nam

Registered: 24 Jan 2006

Posts: 12,828

Status: Offline

Post #8
cwspellowe wrote:
Already advanced the cams mate, well the inlet anyway, feels like it pulls a bit harder but no hard figures to back it up Smile


Hmm, not fantastic torque figure then, but guess the rollers are probably not accurate! Mine was near the 156 mark, but was very close to the valve-meets-piston limit Smile

________________________________________

Nothing to see here
Posted 14th Jun 2010 at 01:50
dented_vts

Regular

Location: london

Registered: 23 Feb 2010

Posts: 440

Status: Offline

Post #9
cwspellowe wrote:
Another job for tidying up some bits and pieces, noticed that the ICV pipe had split off the main inlet pipe, presumably letting the engine fill with unfiltered air Doh

Don't know how long it was like this so I set about replacing and upgrading. Saw someone's thread on here with a 90degree elbow fitted instead and, while it might not make much difference to the car, it looks shiny Cool

When i took the old pipework off I noticed another eric, whoever fitted the K&N before me didn't use the right coupler and the hose clamp had fallen off, so the filter wasn't even attached to the pipe Shock

Must have been like that for a while by the looks of it, given the fact the car RR'd at 175bhp and 143lbft i'd expect at least one of the figures to be up slightly now, not least a better torque curve. That combined with last month's full service and engine flush means she's purring smoothly now and seems to "bark" more than it did.

I also saved expense (not that it's expensive anyway) by using the old breather pipe, the dog leg shape meant the breather sat quite nicely out of the way Smile

Ingredients:

90 degree alloy pipe, 76mm OD, 150mm x 150mm
Two 4 ply silicone joiners, 76mm ID, 76mm long
Mini breather filter
4 70-90mm hose clamps
2 small hose clamps
Coupler for the breather

Before:



After



I'm not going to write any fitting instructions, it's pretty self explanatory.

Haven't taken if for a drive yet, left the battery unhooked tonight ready for an ECU reset tomorrow, football called me in the house before I had chance. Better sound from the engine now and better throttle response, no idea if that would be noticeable over a well fitted filter though Dunno


That is the standard setup minus the box which is tehre to stop shit sticking to the filter= peroformance downgrade. The area of teh standard filter is already massively oversized fort eh power requirements of the engine so no power gain will be had. Even a good rolling road the accuracy will be =/- 7% anyway. original power is claimed to be 123KW- in bhp that would be 165bhp. I think they make about 160bhp when new. add miels average good one puts out 155bhp- performance measured backs this up.

Looks like you have done some top work on your car though- will be agood buy for someone.
Posted 14th Jun 2010 at 02:07
ryangti6

Seasoned Pro

Location: Pontypool

Registered: 01 Sep 2006

Posts: 1,839

Status: Offline

Post #10
Good job on the filter setup.

Out of interest, at what Rpm was your peak power?

________________________________________

Ryan
Posted 14th Jun 2010 at 02:10
cwspellowe

Seasoned Pro

Location: Calderbank

Registered: 19 Jul 2009

Posts: 6,496

Status: Offline

Post #11
dented_vts wrote:


That is the standard setup minus the box which is tehre to stop shit sticking to the filter= peroformance downgrade. The area of teh standard filter is already massively oversized fort eh power requirements of the engine so no power gain will be had.


Partly true, but the inlet piping was designed as a compromise, both flattening out in sections like under the top coolant hose and a concertina'd section to allow for engine movement. The engine is now Group N mounted and, considering the throttle body is 74mm internal diameter or there or there abouts, the new piping shows no restriction to air flow at all. Also the standard feed passes over the top of the radiator adding to the heatsoak. Where it is now it has a nice supply of cold air straight through the front grille.

The idea was to create a much smoother inlet tract than the standard airbox, theoretically improving torque spread if not peak.

dented_vts wrote:
Even a good rolling road the accuracy will be =/- 7% anyway. original power is claimed to be 123KW- in bhp that would be 165bhp. I think they make about 160bhp when new. add miels average good one puts out 155bhp- performance measured backs this up.


Again, we all know of discrepencies on Rolling Roads. However when at the Ecosse Rolling Road last october on 135k miles it made 174.5bhp at 6610rpm. Out of all the normally aspirated GTi6's it came out as the second most powerful, most others coming in at around 160-165bhp, and one dog at 145bhp or so. Even if the rollers were over-reading, or underreading for that matter, it would affect all the results for all the cars. Same day, same atmospheric conditions, same roller calibration. At the very least it's a healthy engine.

Bear in mind those figres came with an induction kit that obviously never fitted the pipe properly, an idle control feed that had split and nearly fallen off, and from the state of the oil and plugs woud appear the car hadn't been serviced in a long time.

Personally i don't think i'm being optimistic when I expect to see an improvement.

Oh and Adam, the timing was only advanced a couple of months ago. The figures were pre-advance Smile

________________________________________

Bye bye Sundance Kid Sad
Posted 14th Jun 2010 at 02:41
dented_vts

Regular

Location: london

Registered: 23 Feb 2010

Posts: 440

Status: Offline

Post #12
cwspellowe wrote:
dented_vts wrote:


That is the standard setup minus the box which is tehre to stop shit sticking to the filter= peroformance downgrade. The area of teh standard filter is already massively oversized fort eh power requirements of the engine so no power gain will be had.


Partly true, but the inlet piping was designed as a compromise, both flattening out in sections like under the top coolant hose and a concertina'd section to allow for engine movement. The engine is now Group N mounted and, considering the throttle body is 74mm internal diameter or there or there abouts, the new piping shows no restriction to air flow at all. Also the standard feed passes over the top of the radiator adding to the heatsoak. Where it is now it has a nice supply of cold air straight through the front grille.

The idea was to create a much smoother inlet tract than the standard airbox, theoretically improving torque spread if not peak.

dented_vts wrote:
Even a good rolling road the accuracy will be =/- 7% anyway. original power is claimed to be 123KW- in bhp that would be 165bhp. I think they make about 160bhp when new. add miels average good one puts out 155bhp- performance measured backs this up.


Again, we all know of discrepencies on Rolling Roads. However when at the Ecosse Rolling Road last october on 135k miles it made 174.5bhp at 6610rpm. Out of all the normally aspirated GTi6's it came out as the second most powerful, most others coming in at around 160-165bhp, and one dog at 145bhp or so. Even if the rollers were over-reading, or underreading for that matter, it would affect all the results for all the cars. Same day, same atmospheric conditions, same roller calibration. At the very least it's a healthy engine.

Bear in mind those figres came with an induction kit that obviously never fitted the pipe properly, an idle control feed that had split and nearly fallen off, and from the state of the oil and plugs woud appear the car hadn't been serviced in a long time.

Personally i don't think i'm being optimistic when I expect to see an improvement.

Oh and Adam, the timing was only advanced a couple of months ago. The figures were pre-advance Smile


intersting- is the engine definately standard- have you had it apart? what exhaust, genuine pug?
Posted 14th Jun 2010 at 03:17
cwspellowe

Seasoned Pro

Location: Calderbank

Registered: 19 Jul 2009

Posts: 6,496

Status: Offline

Post #13
Not had a look internally but the last owner had it for 6 years and no mention of changing anything, was completely standard apart from a blowing custom exhaust of unknown origin and the K&N fail.

**edit

Must just be one of those "weekday" engines

________________________________________

Bye bye Sundance Kid Sad
Posted 14th Jun 2010 at 03:26
jimmyrallye

Seasoned Pro

Location: portsmouth

Registered: 19 Apr 2008

Posts: 3,144

Status: Offline

Post #14
a friday job is always a rush and get me home job , must of been a weekday engine Wink looking good all your threads all my money seems to be going on power tools for work etc at the mo Sad being self employed no good but had a good rebait this year ! oh and my feedback on ebay is outstanding haha

________________________________________


"Police arrested two kids yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off."
Posted 14th Jun 2010 at 03:25
dented_vts

Regular

Location: london

Registered: 23 Feb 2010

Posts: 440

Status: Offline

Post #15
Any pics of this custom exhaust? Maybe that is giving the power?
Posted 14th Jun 2010 at 04:39
gti-dan

Regular

Location: Yorkshire

Registered: 03 Jan 2010

Posts: 461

Status: Offline

Post #16
i disagree with peoples comments about air filters being a downgrade. I think it comes from people taking the pi$$ out of chavs with poor set ups, talking about how their filters have given them 20 bhp etc etc. For this reason they seem to have got a bad reputation, but having just fitted one there is a definate change in the engine's characteristics - admittedly it is only subtle but the power band has clearly shifted up a bit and there is more power. This can be due to a number of reasons. One thing i would say to the op is to go for some cold air induction piping clipped onto the filter and out through the front.

p.s. people must be driving through some pretty deep puddles to be ruining their enines!
Posted 15th Jun 2010 at 01:03
adam b

Seasoned Pro

Location: The Nam

Registered: 24 Jan 2006

Posts: 12,828

Status: Offline

Post #17
If a standard engine is setup right with a standard exhaust and induction then it can make those figures. Mine was always 156lbft with power readings between 172 and 179 on different rolling roads. It was standard at that point apart from the cam timing. Knowing the many issues with rolling roads however I was happy that it was a good curve set and always seemed quicker than other similar cars.

Better get mine on the rollers soon and see what the cam timing does on the V6. I know another 20lbft and 10BHp can be found if its setup right. Wink

________________________________________

Nothing to see here
Posted 15th Jun 2010 at 01:14
gti-dan

Regular

Location: Yorkshire

Registered: 03 Jan 2010

Posts: 461

Status: Offline

Post #18
how long do you have to leave the battery disconnected for the ecu reset? it doesnt affect your alarm / immoboliser does it?

What does it do? could it negatively effect performance?
Posted 15th Jun 2010 at 01:18
adam b

Seasoned Pro

Location: The Nam

Registered: 24 Jan 2006

Posts: 12,828

Status: Offline

Post #19
Look in the FAQ section Dan

________________________________________

Nothing to see here
Posted 15th Jun 2010 at 01:22
bukosgti6

Regular

Location: leicester

Registered: 14 Jun 2010

Posts: 170

Status: Offline

Post #20
10 mins dan
Posted 15th Jun 2010 at 01:22
cwspellowe

Seasoned Pro

Location: Calderbank

Registered: 19 Jul 2009

Posts: 6,496

Status: Offline

Post #21
gti-dan wrote:
p.s. people must be driving through some pretty deep puddles to be ruining their enines!


+1

The induction kit sits about 12" off the ground and is in front of the wheels so no splashback, people must just be daft to drive through puddles slowly with an open filter Doh

________________________________________

Bye bye Sundance Kid Sad
Posted 15th Jun 2010 at 03:15
monkeyman

Seasoned Pro

Location: Sunny St Albans

Registered: 01 Oct 2008

Posts: 1,955

Status: Offline

Post #22
Good idea to reuse the idle feed hose with a new filter Smile

Here is the thread for fitting to the standard airbox

http://www.306gti6.com/forum/showthread.php?id=124421&page=1

________________________________________

Spanner Monkeys Monkey Spanner
Forum Search Clicky
Posted 15th Jun 2010 at 23:33
cwspellowe

Seasoned Pro

Location: Calderbank

Registered: 19 Jul 2009

Posts: 6,496

Status: Offline

Post #23
Aye cheers mate, that's the thread I used for reference. Good thing with using an induction kit is I could sit it where I wanted it

________________________________________

Bye bye Sundance Kid Sad
Posted 15th Jun 2010 at 23:38
cwspellowe

Seasoned Pro

Location: Calderbank

Registered: 19 Jul 2009

Posts: 6,496

Status: Offline

Post #24
Well.. after about 4 days of driving with the new pipework, I can say it's made a noticeable difference Yes

Only been tested with my trusty arse dyno, but pickup from 2k rpm is much smoother now, less of a "kick" when it gets to the power band, just seems to pull harder theroughout the whole rev range.

Makes an awesome rasping noise now at 6k rpm and above, if i can be arsed i'll get the mini cam out and see if i can get a video Thumbs up

________________________________________

Bye bye Sundance Kid Sad
Posted 16th Jun 2010 at 22:57

All times are GMT. The time is now 12:00

The Peugeot GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club - ©2024 all rights reserved.

Please Note: The views and opinions found herein are those of individuals, and not of The Peugeot 306 GTi-6 & Rallye Owners Club or any individuals involved.
No responsibility is taken or assumed for any comments or statements made on, or in relation to, this website. Please see our updated privacy policy.